August 18, 2010

Off the grid

Earlier this year, five brain researchers journeyed deep into the recesses of southern Utah, to an area along the San Juan River so remote that cell phones don’t work. (That cell phones don’t work in the middle of nowhere is not really shocking; why they don’t work in certain pockets of major metropolitan areas, or certain corners of my condo for that matter, remains a mystery to me. But I digress…) The scientists left behind their laptops, spent their days rafting and hiking, and camped at night under endless stars. Their goal was to understand how digital devices affect the way our brains work and to determine if taking a break from technology can reverse those effects. The group’s experience is the subject of the latest article in the NY Times “Your Brain on Computers” series, and it’s fascinating.

The trip’s organizer, David Strayer, a psychology professor at the University of Utah, studies the effect technology has on attention, memory and learning. Understanding how attention works could help in treating things like ADD and depression, he says. Strayer also posits that too much digital stimulation can put otherwise normally functioning people “in a range where they’re not psychologically healthy.”

The scientists at one point discuss a University of Michigan study that found people better learn after walking in the woods than after walking on a busy street. “The study indicates that learning centers in the brain become taxed when asked to process information, even during the relatively passive experience of taking in an urban setting. By extension, some scientists believe heavy multitasking fatigues the brain, draining it of the ability to focus.”

That’s potentially significant stuff in an age where more kids--particularly in big cities, it seems--are being diagnosed with attention and sensory processing disorders. There’s the debate, of course, about whether these are new challenges or they’re just being diagnosed more, but regardless, Strayer argues that being in nature can give the brain the break it needs: “Our senses change. They kind of recalibrate — you notice sounds, like these crickets chirping; you hear the river, the sounds, the smells, you become more connected to the physical environment, the earth, rather than the artificial environment.”

Another point worth noting is the idea that technology has changed our perception of what’s urgent. That little red light on the mobile device has been blinking so much in the past few years that we find ourselves constantly looking to it for the next e-mail message. According to these scientists, that expectation eats into the brain’s working memory. (Finally, a reasonable explanation for where my mind has gone! Of course, there are other possible culprits--lack of sleep, a recent switch to half-caffeinated coffee, early-onset dementia…)

Such distractions have important implications for the way we parent, naturally, a topic discussed in an earlier article (“The Risks of Parenting While Plugged In”) from the same NYT series. Not surprisingly, the more distracted we are by our phones and laptops, the less engaged we are as parents and the less quality time our kids get.

What to do? If we listen to our camping scientist friends, a family vacation in the middle of nowhere might be in order (ever been to Cherry County, Nebraska?). And in terms of addressing the problem on a daily basis, the mom at the end of the Plugged-In Parents article had what seems to me to be a pretty workable solution: establishing an e-mail and Internet ban for a few hours each day. I’ve also toyed with the idea of cutting Web and e-mail service on my cell phone and using it only for calls—a decent way to save more than a few bucks each month, too--though I’m not sure I’m prepared to take that plunge. Either way, I know I want to try to get a grip on this “device distraction” now. My kids are little, so it’s only a one-sided battle (with myself) as of now. It won’t be long before they, too, will be distracted by the phone, the computer, the TV, the iPod and whatever else is on its way.

How concerned are you about the effect technology has on you and your little one(s)? Do you do anything to take a break from it? Does it require traveling to a remote locale, or are there ways to give ourselves some time off each day?

3 comments:

  1. I definitely worry about the effects of technology on all our lives. There's a degree of addiction, for me, and for a lot of my family members. It's such a double-edged sword, though, because certain things, like my iPhone, really have changed my life for the better -- and, I could argue, make me a better parent, because I can easily get information and manage our calendars on the fly, keep an eye on something work-related while hanging out with D, snap pictures and capture video anywhere, blog from my phone for the grandparents' sake etc. I just have to keep it in check, remember to focus on him and put the phone away for long stretches.

    I am hoping, though, to keep any kind of personal tech out of Drew's hands for a long, long time. I mean, he plays with my phone on a long car trip. But I don't want him to have his own until, oh, college. We'll see if that works. I am sure it will be an uphill battle.

    TV is one thing I can easily do without, and it's not been too difficult so far to really limit D's access. Certain stuff I actually like him to see, though, at least in small doses. Like Mr. Rogers ... sadly off the air in NY, but available on pbskids.org!

    Nature, to me, is a separate if related concern, and a big one. I try to give him access here in the city, but it's hard. We go to the botanic garden once a week and just ramble; throw sticks in the creek and pick up pinecones and whatnot. But that's once a week at best. Vacations absolutely must be bucolic. I dragged his butt to the beach every single day when we were in Florida last week.

    Did anyone see that piece in the NYT today about college students' habits? One was that they hardly use e-mail at all, and for the first time, I see that coming for all of us, at least in terms of personal e-mail. My personal e-mail inbox has turned into a graveyard. I stopped being able to keep up about six months ago and after a long anguished period, have stopped caring, more or less. Now when work e-mail gets abolished ... that'll be something!

    Oh and social networks: To me, that's still the scariest part. I just can't give much of anything of myself over to Facebook. I tweeted for about a week and never went back. I do think there's probably a social network that I'd happily join and contribute to on a regular basis, but it doesn't exist yet. It would need to be everything I wanted -- like effortless access to and information about the people I love -- and nothing I don't. (Like marketing crap.) A girl can dream.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just heard on the radio that teens today consume 5 hours of media in 3 hours (she said while emailing and half-listening to a conf call). We are better at "multi-tasking" but is that a good thing? Are we smarter, better, faster? And even if we are, is that a "good" thing. Ah, progress and the digital era. . . . I'm wondering what Victorian women would have blogged about on how the industrial revolution impacted their lives and families.

    I'm on a short term assignment in Ireland and we don't have internet or cell phone access -- while it's made work tougher THAT"S OK. When I'm with my 2 year old son, Rudy, I'm with him -- I'm not thinking about who might be trying to get a hold of me. I agree with you, Kelly, that iPhone has made life better / more convenient in a lot of ways. But it's the "always on" element that's a double edged sword. It comes down to being good about setting your priorities and your boundaries (and your kids boundaries), but the "temptation" and omnipresent availability makes it tougher.

    A year ago today I stopped pumping and celebrated my last trip to the mom's room at work. I actually take pride in what I was able to accomplish in that room 3x a day -- pumping, eating, emailing, reading parenting mags, and on conf calls all at once. Why do I evaluate myself on "getting a lot done"?

    I'm stuck at work since I have a 7pm conference call and can't go home to see my boys since I don't have a phone. Let's see, what media to consume -- I know, I'll call Kelly Bare to wish her a HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sara, was it on NPR that you heard that? They picked up the NYT piece and I happened to hear it in the car yesterday. Here's the link to the audio file for anyone that would rather listen:

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129384107

    Sara & KB, your point about how all this stuff can improve our lives is important. We can work from home, "visit" with family via Web cam, get photos of what our little ones are doing right now while we're at work. Those aren't small things. Also, in the NPR coverage, the NYT reporter mentions some ways in which the increase in information has been good for our brains. He references research about how some video gamers have more visual acuity than those who don't game. I expect you both to get out there and game!

    I also like another thing he said in the NPR piece--that it might be useful to look at technology like we do food. Some of it's good for us, some of it's junk.

    KB, on college students not reading e-mail...I read something similar recently--that they all use texts and IM because it's faster. I might sound like a cranky old copyeditor when I say this, but it kind of makes me worry about how people use language. Will people know how to write coherent sentences?

    And yes, HAPPY B-DAY, old friend (wait! not "old" like that! Old as in "friend I've known for 16 years." Yes, when I met you, we did not have cell phones. I'm kind of nostalgic for such a simple time.

    ReplyDelete